Course Description:
This course is the capstone course for business majors in their preparation to enter, or further, their career in the business world. The objective of this course is to formulate and implement strategies that will provide a direction for the business to follow, leading to enduring business success.
Course Process:
This course involves the "interactive learning" approach, whereby you are responsible not only for your learning but also the learning of other class members. It is my intent we approach each class in the spirit of mutual support, commitment, and competence.
The interactive learning process involves:
To accomplish this, a large part of this course will take place in learning teams. The teams will be assigned at the first meeting and remain the same throughout the term.
Required Texts and Materials:
Hitt, M.A., Ireland , R.D., & Hoskisson, R.E. Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization . 7th Edition. South-Western Publishing Company, Cincinnati , OH .
St. Martin 's Pocket Guide to Research and Documentation, 3 rd Edition. Baldwin-Wallace.
Capstone®; Business Simulation "Studentr Guide."
Other materials distributed/assigned by the instructor.
The Wall Street Journal
Competencies:
This course requires oral and written communication skills, analytical reasoning, data gathering, data organization, and creativity. It will draw upon your past courses and serve as a vehicle for integrating your past areas of study into a holistic process, thus setting the direction for an organizational entity, a professional career or personal quest. More specifically, this course will focus on knowledge and skill development, as detailed below.
Knowledge:
Skills:
Students in the policy and strategy course should be expected to demonstrate such skills as the following in dealing with specific cases and in using the research findings presented:
Instructor-Student Objectives:
There are several additional overreaching objectives of the policy and strategy course that should be mentioned. One is to stimulate students to think for themselves in dealing with specific business problems without depending upon the instructor for "the answer." Another is to help students make a transition from the academic world to operations by providing them with the opportunity to deal with problems, patterns of thinking, and so on, that are encountered in the organizational world. Finally, the policy course should seek to give students a rich learning experience, which is achieved with pleasure and high interest.
A NOTE ON CASE ANALYSIS AND CLASSROOM DISCUSSION
There is no correct way to analyze or discuss cases. For most problems a manager faces, there are a number of possible and equally acceptable courses of action. Often, too, the decision as to what is the best course of action rests on one's values.
Instead of looking for the "right" answer or one about which there is a consensus in the class, students should be more concerned about identifying the critical problem; finding feasible alternative courses of action; evaluating alternatives in terms of available knowledge, concepts, tested practices, lessons of experience, and relevant scientific techniques; testing alternatives against evaluations of company strengths and weaknesses; developing detailed plans to determine the credibility of chosen policies and strategies; matching potential gains against calculated risks; thinking through carefully the timing of actions and how to make sure action is in conformance with plans; and so on.
More important than finding a "solution" is the analysis and interchange of ideas that take lace in the class discussion. There should be a maximum of discussion among students so that various views about the cases can be aired. Students need the opportunity to present their analyses and conclusions and to engage in debate for their peers in advancing their positions. The opportunity for students to think for themselves without domination from their peers and the instructor is important.
Students often find it is interesting to "update" cases in the sense of finding out what really happened after the end of the case. That is, of course, interesting but not vital. What one person did in the past is not germane to the analysis of the case itself. It may be interesting for students to compare their recommendations with those decisions actually made, however. Yet if there is a difference between the two, not too much can be concluded from the variation because circumstances change very quickly. Managers on the spot have more information at the time of a decision than students with only case materials, and in any event, no one really knows what would have happened had a different decision been made by either the students or the practicing managers.
In analyzing the cases, it is often helpful to identify the alternative strategies and your recommendation.
Course Requirements
Individual Assignments:
All students will complete an individual company and industry analysis and a written case analysis as a homework assignment. Instructions for these assignments will be provided at a later date. The last written assignment is a learning journal. See the end of this syllabus for details. Cases will be discussed in class.
Each assignment is worth 100 points, and the percentage of each assignment toward the total points is detailed below. The individual and group assignment percentages are as follows:
Individual Company and Industry Report 40%
Classroom Contribution 10%
Capstone®; 25%
Learning Journal 15%
Final Exam 10%
Total 100%
Final grades will be assigned according to the following scale.
94 - 100 A
90 - 93 A-
87 - 89 B+
83 - 86 B
80 - 82 B-
77 - 79 C+
73 - 76 C
70 - 72 C-
67 - 69 D+
64 - 66 D
60 - 63 D-
0 - 59 F
Absences:
It is important that you make every effort to attend class. You are permitted two unexcused absences . Students with three unexcused absences will be required to complete an additional assignment determined by the instructor on a student-by-student basis. This assignment will NOT add to nor contribute, in any way, to the final grade. However, if of poor quality, or not given the attention it deserves, it may result in a loss of points toward your final grade. This is based on the instructor's subjective evaluation of the each student's additional effort. Students with four or more absences must see the instructor immediately and discuss the reasons for and ramifications of the absences. Additional assignments may be required. Arriving 5 or more minutes after the class starts will be considered an absence.
Late Submission Policy:
Papers are due on the dates as shown in this syllabus. Late submissions are not the norm and may result in a loss of points for the assignment, depending on the quality of the work performed.
Academic Honesty Policy:
This course follows the policy on Academic Honesty established by Baldwin-Wallace College . Any student not following this policy for any assignment will receive 0 points for that assignment. See the College Catalogue and Student Handbook for details regarding cheating, plagiarism, etc.
Written Assignments:
ALL written assignments must be type written, double-spaced. All papers MUST follow APA format, exhibit a high degree of professionalism, and demonstrate a command of grammar and punctuation.
Disability-Related Accommodations:
Any student with a documented disability (for example, physical, learning, psychiatric, vision, hearing, and so forth) who needs to arrange reasonable accommodations must contact the instructor and the coordinator of disability services at the beginning of this semester.
Session 1 Monday, January 8
Topic: Introduction to Course and Group Formation
Preclass work: None
Session 2 Wednesday, January 10
Topic: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness, Group Project Review
Preclass work: Read Chapter 1
Session 3 Monday, January 15
Session 4 Wednesday, January 17
Topic: The External Environment/Capstone®;®; Review
Preclass work: Read Chapter 2
Session 5 Monday, January 22
Topic: The Internal Environment
Preclass work: Read Chapter 3
Session 6 Wednesday, January 24
Topic: Stakeholder Analysis/Capstone®; Review: Worksheet /Practice Round 1
Preclass work: None
Session 7 Monday, January 29
Topic: Business Level Strategies and Capstone®; Review
Preclass work: Read Chapter 4
Session 8 Wednesday, January 31
Topic: Stakeholder Analysis: H.B. Fuller: Practice Round 2/WSJ/Sustainability Review
Preclass work: Read case
Session 9 Monday, February 5
Topic: Competitive Dynamics
Preclass work: Read Chapter 5
Session 10 Wednesday, February 7
Topic: Case Analysis, TBD: Practice Round 3
Preclass work: Read Case
Session 11 Monday, February 12
Topic Corporate Level Strategy
Preclass work: Read Chapter 6
Sustainability Paper Part I Due
Session 12 Wednesday, February 14
Topic Case Analysis, TBD: R1
Preclass work: Read case
Session 13 Monday, February 19
Topic Acquisition and Restructuring Strategies
Preclass work: Read Chapter 7
Session 14 Wednesday, February 21
Topic Case Analysis, TBD: R2
Preclass work: Read Case
Session 15 Monday, February 26
Topic International Strategy
Preclass work: Read Chapter 8
Session 16 Wednesday, February 28
Topic Case Analysis, TBD: R3
Preclass work: Read case
Session 17 Monday, March 12
Topic Cooperative Strategy
Preclass work: Read Chapter 9
Session 18 Wednesday, March 14
Topic Case Analysis, TBD: R4
Preclass work: Read Case
Session 19 Monday, March 19
Topic Corporate Governance
Preclass work: Read Chapter 10
Session 20 Wednesday, March 21
Topic Conference Board/ Rudman: R5
Preclass work: Read Handout
Sustainability Paper Part II Due
Session 21 Monday, March 26
Topic Organizational Structure and Control
Preclass work: Read Chapter 11
Session 22 Wednesday, March 28
Topic Case Analysis, TBD: R6
Preclass work: Read Case
Session 23 Monday, April 2
Topic Strategic Leadership/ Level 5 Leadership
Preclass work: Read Chapter 12
Session 24 Wednesday, April 4
Topic Level 5 Leadership
Preclass work: Read Handout
Session 25 Monday, April 9
Easter Monday-No Class
Session 26 Wednesday, April 11
Topic Corporate Entrepreneurship
Preclass work Read Chapter 13
Session 27 Monday, April 16
Topic Balanced Scorecard: R8
Preclass work Read Handout s
Session 28 Wednesday, April 18
Topic Creating Vision, Leading Change
Preclass work: Read Handout
Session 29 Monday, April 23
Topic Capstone®; Presentations
Preclass work: None
Learning Journal Due
Session 30 Wednesday, April 25
Topic Capstone®; Presentations
Preclass work: None
Session 31 Wednesday, May 2
Final Exam
1:00pm
Learning Journal Assignment
This assignment involves maintaining a journal and a written paper required near the end of the course. If you have never kept a journal, be sure to follow these guidelines. The purpose of the journal is for you to track your insights, learning and development throughout the course.
Pick a concept from the course reading or lecture material and write about this concept.
Apply this concept at work and see what develops. Dialogue with yourself about the results of this situation. What insights can be obtained? How did others receive it? Take as many perceptual positions as possible. Maintain a journal based on the above. The object of this process is to get in touch with your own process of thinking and developing, so you can consciously direct your growth, development and experiences to become more in all that you do. Fifteen (15) entries are required . Thus, you will need to double up on your entries at some point during the semester.
The written assignment is not just the function of handing in your journal to the instructor, nor summarizing the events you recorded. After reviewing your journal near the end of the course, write your summary paper answering the questions in the three sections below. Use the section headings MEANING, LEARNING, PROCESS OF CHANGE.
Meaning: Review the journal and look for the meaning it holds. What have you discovered about yourself, and what you're thinking? What will you continue to do the same or what will you do differently?
Learning: Review the journal and look for the learning you have gained. What do you know about yourself that you did not know at the beginning of this course? What was this learning? What does it tell you about yourself and your place in the organization?
Process of Change: Review the journal and look for the process of change you experienced. How did you change from the first day of this course as compared to the time of writing this journal paper? Did the process involve testing hypotheses, learning from experiences, dialoging with classmates, peers, and managers? What was it that you did that allowed you to change?
Turn in both your journal and the written summary near the end of the course. See the course schedule for the exact date.
Distinguishing Qualities of A Papers
The A paper is superior in thesis and content, distinctive in style, and free of errors in grammar and mechanics.
Distinguishing Qualities of B Papers
The B paper is sound but not superior.
Distinguishing Qualities of C Papers
The C paper is competent but average.
Characteristic Weaknesses of D, F, and U Writing
The D (or U) paper is unsatisfactory in content, organization, development, or grammar and mechanics. The F (or U) paper is outstandingly deficient in one or more of these.
UNDERSTANDING GRADES
Grading performance constitutes a complex and difficult process. While human beings cannot be pigeon-hold, they can be judged on the basis of effort and achievement, not effort alone. These descriptions attempt to explain why different students obtain different results.
The A Student- An Outstanding Student 90-100 points
Results "A" students make high grades on tests-usually the highest in the class. Their work is a pleasure to grade.
The "B" Student- A Good Student 80-89 points
Results "B" students obtain consistently good but not distinguished results on tests. Most of their work is accurate but may lack in detail and certain specific information.
The "C" Student- An Average or Typical Student 70-79 points
Results "C" students obtain mediocre or inconsistent results on tests. They have some concept of what is going on but clearly have not mastered the material.
The "D" Student- A Below Average Student 60-69 points
Results "D" students do poorly on tests. Their understanding of the subject matter shows little mastery of the course topics.
The "F" Student- A Failing Student 0-59 points
Results "F" students usually obtain very poor exam grades and do poorly on other assignments.